An Analysis Of Cancer Research Scientists
"Fight cancer", "Beat cancer" are extremely popular expressions currently, and it's good so. Although October, the Breast cancer Awareness Month is over, for several still see many individuals wearing pink ribbons on their jackets, which is a demonstration of their will to help those women who experience this disease. Which can be very much appreciated and should be acknowledged. Fundraising and information events, web pages, donations, merchandise, advertisements all around the media, groups on social networking sites, individuals spreading the phrase - attention will be given to the topic and significant amount of money is collected.
On the flip side, looking a little bit closer, as a cancer survivor myself who studied the topic from the most various resources accessible for public, I personally have some questions, doubts and reservations about these research programs and could possibly be a bad person, but I did not donate one single cent and not intend to do so. Tell you why.
Fight. A vital word when talking about cancer.
How do you best fight to ensure that you win? You know your enemy.
An issue - any problem - may be only handled if one knows the exact cause of it. This will be clear - how else do you solve a situation, if you don't know what is it exactly?
Let's take cancer of the breast, it looks like this: yearly $ millions are spent to find out the causes of cancer And even more importantly, develop new treatments. Let me suggest: treatments may be only effective when they target the root of the problem... "The exact causes of breast cancer are not known." In reality, as outlined by the publicly available statements, causes of cancer are a mystery for the health care industry.
The theory of changed or damaged genes is wide spread, and an information video on the Medical News Today site gives just a little hint on why does it occur: "Damage or change in the genetic material of cells by environmental of internal factors sometimes results in cells that don't die and continue to multiply until a massive cancer cell or tumor develops."
Excellent. The next phase will be then to investigate these environmental or internal factors that damage or change the genetic material of cells, would not it?
The environmental factors are essentially recognized for the scientists as well as for the general public: bad nutrition, tobacco, certain chemicals that we use, etc. Cancer research should go then within the direction of eliminating these factors: educating the people on correct eating habits, cutting back the usage of harmful chemicals, and so forth. And cancer treatment would primarily consist of targeting the cause of cancer, the reason why those genes got changed or damaged: increasing certain vitamins and other nutrition supplements, cleansing and physical exercise that can help one's body push out the accumulated toxins, boosting the own self defense of the human body, click through the following web page immune system and so on.
But this is not how it goes. Cancer researches deal mostly with developing the standard therapies by official medicine: new drugs, radiation, hormones and surgery. And cancer treatments available in hospitals are mainly about giving chemotherapy and such to the patients. Can anyone find out how adding extra chemicals into the already overwhelmed and weakened system would help the human body to recover? Because it will not.
