7 Valuable Lessons About Cancer Research Scientists That You ll Never Forget

"Fight cancer", "Beat cancer" are very popular expressions right now, and it is good so. Although October, the Cancer of the breast Awareness Month is over, for various still see lots of people wearing pink ribbons on their jackets, which is a demonstration of their will to help those women who have problems with this disease. Which is quite much appreciated and should be acknowledged. Fundraising and information events, web pages, donations, merchandise, ads all over the media, groups on social networking sites, individuals spreading the phrase - attention is obviously given to the subject and significant amount of cash is collected.

Conversely, looking a little bit closer, as a cancer survivor myself who studied the subject from the most various resources accessible for public, I personally have some questions, doubts and reservations about these research programs and could possibly be a bad person, but I did not donate one single cent and not intend to do so. Tell you why.

Fight. A vital word when discussing future cancer research.

How do you best fight so that you win? You know your enemy.

A problem - any problem - can be only handled if one knows the exact cause of it. This should be clear - how else do you solve a situation, if you don't know what is it exactly?

Let's take cancer of the breast, it looks like this: per year $ millions are spent to find out the causes of cancer And more importantly, develop new treatments. Let me suggest: treatments may be only effective once they target the root of the problem... "The exact causes of cancer of the breast are not known." Actually, based on the publicly available statements, causes of cancer are a mystery for the health sector.

The theory of changed or damaged genes is wide spread, and an information video on the Medical News Today site gives just a little hint on why does it occur: "Damage or change within the genetic material of cells by environmental of internal factors sometimes results in cells that don't die and continue to multiply until a tremendous cancer cell or tumor develops."

Excellent. The next step would be then to investigate these environmental or internal factors that damage or change the genetic material of cells, wouldn't it?

The environmental factors are essentially known for the scientists and for the public: bad nutrition, tobacco, certain chemicals that we use, etc. Cancer research should go then within the direction of eliminating these factors: educating the populace on correct eating habits, cutting back the usage of harmful chemicals, and so on. And cancer treatment would primarily consist of targeting the cause of cancer, the main reason why those genes got changed or damaged: increasing certain vitamins as well as other nutrition supplements, cleansing and physical exercise that can help the body push out the accumulated toxins, boosting the own self defense of the body, the immune system and so forth.

But this is not how it goes. Cancer researches deal mostly with developing the standard therapies by official medicine: new drugs, radiation, hormones and surgery. And cancer treatments accessible in hospitals are mainly about giving chemotherapy and such to the patients. Can anyone see how adding extra chemicals in to the already overwhelmed and weakened system would help the body to recover? Since it will not.