Understanding Cancer Research Scientists

"Fight cancer", "Beat cancer" are very popular expressions these days, and it's good so. Although October, the Cancer of the breast Awareness Month is over, for a number of still see many people wearing pink ribbons on their own jackets, which is a demonstration of their will to help those women who experience this disease. And this is very much appreciated and should be acknowledged. Fundraising and information events, sites, donations, merchandise, ads all around the media, groups on social networking sites, individuals spreading the phrase - attention is obviously given to the topic and significant amount of money is collected.

In contrast, looking a little bit closer, as a cancer survivor myself who studied the topic from the most various resources readily available for public, I personally have some questions, doubts and reservations about these research programs and may very well be a bad person, but I did not donate one single cent and not intend to do so. Tell you why.

Fight. An integral word when talking about cancer.

How do you best fight to ensure that you win? You know your enemy.

An issue - any problem - may be only handled if one knows the exact cause of it. This certainly will be clear - how else do you solve a situation, should you not determine what is it exactly?

Let's take cancer of the breast, it looks like this: on a yearly basis $ millions are spent to discover the causes of cancer And many more importantly, develop new treatments. Let me suggest: treatments may be only effective when they target the root of the problem... "The exact causes of breast cancer are not known." Actually, based on the publicly available statements, causes of cancer are a mystery for the medical field.

The theory of changed or damaged genes is wide spread, and an information video on the Medical News Today site gives just a little hint on why does it occur: "Damage or change in the genetic material of cells by environmental of internal factors sometimes results in cells that do not die and continue to multiply until a massive cancer cell or tumor develops."

Excellent. The next phase will be then to investigate these environmental or internal factors that damage or change the genetic material of cells, wouldn't it?

The environmental factors are pretty much known for the scientists and then for the general public: bad nutrition, tobacco, certain chemicals that we use, etc. Cancer research should go then within the direction of eliminating these factors: educating the people on correct eating habits, cutting back click through the next website utilization of harmful chemicals, and so on. And cancer treatment would primarily consist of targeting the cause of cancer, the rationale why those genes got changed or damaged: increasing certain vitamins as well as other nutrition supplements, cleansing and physical exercise that can help one's body push out the accumulated toxins, boosting the own self defense of the human body, the immune system and so forth.

But this is not how it goes. Cancer researches deal mostly with developing the standard therapies by official medicine: new drugs, radiation, hormones and surgery. And cancer treatments obtainable in hospitals are mainly about giving chemotherapy and such to the patients. Can anyone find out how adding extra chemicals in to the already overwhelmed and weakened system would help the body to recover? Because it will not.